Documented
Public materials and blockchain records connect RACERVERSE with Lucky Machines products, paid purchases, and delivery before Mattel's filing.
Lucky Machines v. Mattel - public record
Lucky Machines publicly presented and sold products under RACERVERSE in early 2022. Mattel later applied for HOT WHEELS RACERVERSE. Lucky Machines opposed that application, and the proceeding remains pending.
Pending: The official TTAB docket lists Opposition No. 91290947 as pending. No final merits decision has issued. Record reviewed through October 6, 2026.

Evidence snapshot
The public chronology, source-linked records, and each party's stated position.
A final ruling on priority, confusion, intent, copying, liability, or damages.
One-minute orientation
Source-linked facts, a party's interpretation, and undecided legal issues are not interchangeable.
Public materials and blockchain records connect RACERVERSE with Lucky Machines products, paid purchases, and delivery before Mattel's filing.
That combined mark-product-sale record supports source-identifying trademark use, not merely the name of a fictional setting.
The TTAB has not finally decided priority, confusion, intent, registrability, or any other merits issue.
Essential chronology
Project history, completed commerce, Mattel's filing, and later procedure are distinct facts with different evidentiary weight.
Lucky Machines' position
Lucky Machines identifies October 2021 as the start of racerverse.com operations. Preserved project records support continuity, but this is not presented as the technical-use anchor.
Documented fact
A public Polygon submission placed RACERVERSE and MINT KEY SALE in the same Lucky Machines presentation.
Documented fact
A public Avalanche PurchaseKeys transaction records 0.54 AVAX paid and three Mint Keys delivered.
Documented fact
Mattel filed U.S. Application Serial No. 97708782 for HOT WHEELS RACERVERSE.
Documented fact
Lucky Machines filed TTAB Opposition No. 91290947. Allegations in the filing are party positions, not findings.
Documented fact
The docket lists Mattel's amended motion to compel and Mattel's motion to strike its original motion to compel.
Documented fact
The docket lists entry 30 as a defendant motion for extension with consent.
Documented fact
The docket lists entry 31 as the plaintiff's opposition or response to a motion.
Documented fact
The docket lists entry 32 as Mattel's motion to strike its own earlier motion to compel. The public docket still shows the proceeding as pending; the filing is not a Board ruling.
Documented fact
The official TTAB docket was rechecked and still listed the proceeding as pending, with entry 32 - Mattel's motion to strike its own earlier motion to compel - as the latest displayed event. No final merits decision was displayed.
Documented fact
The Board entered docket entry 33, TRIAL DATES RESET, and granted the parties' consent motions to extend the expert disclosure deadline and subsequent dates. Expert disclosures are due October 13, 2026; discovery closes November 12, 2026; plaintiff's pretrial disclosures are due December 27, 2026; defendant's pretrial disclosures are due February 10, 2027; defendant's trial period ends February 25, 2027; plaintiff's rebuttal period ends April 26, 2027; and briefing runs through August 24, 2027. This procedural order does not decide the merits. Entry 32 remains in the chronology: Mattel withdrew its own earlier motion to compel, and the Board gave that filing and the response no further consideration.
Documented fact
The official TTABVUE docket was rechecked and still listed Opposition No. 91290947 as pending. Entry 33, TRIAL DATES RESET, remained the latest displayed event; no final merits decision was displayed.
Pending issue
Docket entry 34: more than two years into the case, Mattel asked the Board for permission to add new defenses. Lucky Machines disputes them. The Board has not ruled; no final merits decision has issued.
Choose the question you are investigating
Each page has a defined role. Supporting detail is consolidated under the record it explains.
Lucky Machines' position
The complete advocacy narrative: chronology, original racers, pleaded claims, requested outcome, and linked public sources.
Open this recordEvidence appendix
The narrower source record connecting public branding, identified products, payment, delivery, and redemption.
Open this recordMattel statements and records
Investor statements, designer interviews, community-input practices, social activity, product transition, and digital-collectibles context in one sourced record.
Open this recordPending issue
A neutral procedural summary with direct links to the official TTAB docket and application record.
Open this recordPersonal account
Lucky Machines' first-person account of the time, discoverability, and opportunity costs of the dispute.
Open this recordReading key
These labels keep evidence, attribution, advocacy, lived experience, and undecided issues separate.
A date, transaction, publication, or filing supported by a linked record.
A quotation or close paraphrase from a Mattel publication or representative.
Lucky Machines' interpretation or argument, not a ruling by the TTAB.
Lucky Machines' description of its own experience and practical effects.
A disputed question the TTAB has not finally decided.
For reporters and researchers
On September 30, 2026, Mattel moved to amend its answer and add new defenses (docket entry 34). Lucky Machines disputes them. The Board has not ruled. On September 17, 2026, the Board entered docket entry 33, TRIAL DATES RESET. The Board granted the parties' consent motions to extend the expert disclosure deadline and subsequent dates. Expert disclosures are due October 13, 2026; discovery closes November 12, 2026; plaintiff's pretrial disclosures are due December 27, 2026; defendant's pretrial disclosures are due February 10, 2027; defendant's trial period ends February 25, 2027; plaintiff's rebuttal period ends April 26, 2027; and briefing runs through August 24, 2027. This is a procedural schedule order, not a merits ruling. The September 7 entry 32 remains part of the chronology: it was labeled Mattel's motion to strike its own earlier motion to compel; Mattel withdrew its own earlier motion to compel, and the Board gave the filing no further consideration. The official docket controls procedural status.